Q1: Is the 2382×1134mm solar module compatible with existing 1P/2P trackers?
a: yes Because the width (1134 mm) is the same as the standard 182 mm modules, mounting clamps and torque tube placement often require modifications. However, due to the increased length (2382 mm), tracker length and row spacing may require minor adjustments to avoid shading.
Q2: Why is the “golden size” better than making the largest module possible?
a: “Largest” often means higher BOS costs due to handling requirements, less container usage (shipping air), and greater breakage risks. The “golden size” makes better whole Value chain, not just module power rating.
Q3: Can this size be handled by a two-person installation team?
a: yes A width of 1134 mm is within the ergonomic “arm’s span” of the average installer. Wider modules (eg 1303 mm) are often unwieldy, increasing installation time and risking accidental drops or back injuries.
About the author: [Your Name/Company Details] Solar is an expert in PV technology, focusing on supply chain optimization and LCOE reduction strategies for utility-scale projects.
Keywords: Solar modules, PV module size, 210R cells, golden size, container shipping, solar logistics, module safety, manufacturing efficiency, LCOE.
Related Topics:
Trisection vs. Quad Section Cell Layout (210R Technology)
Evolution from 182 mm (M10) to 210 mm (G12) wafers
Bifacial Module Glass Technology (2.0mm+2.0mm)
